
For most, the web is a place of expression. Most of my clients see their website as an extension of themselves and they want to put their best foot forward for their visitors. In theory, I agree 100%. I certainly wouldn't show up to a black-tie event in jeans and a t-shirt, so why would anyone want to put forward anything less than their best possible effort for their customers? Personally I truly see the web as a medium of art and a place of self-expression.
Once of the biggest compromises I find that I have to make in my line of work is design. Usually, my clients want a site that's beautiful AND converts their visitors into customers. What do you do when a clients hands you a design that actually REDUCES usability, but the client insists that the design is perfect? Asking for any change is a big deal, and needs to be done extremely skillfully.
First, I find things about my client's design that I genuinely admire and want to give as much praise to as possible. Asking for a change is much easier when the client believes that I honor their creativity and personal taste. As I said, I find things that I GENUINELY admire, so this is not simply flattery. I have found that flattery is usually easy to spot, and it tends to be a kind of passive-aggression; like a patronizing pat on the head as if to say, "Nice try, kid." It's likely that there will be times when I will have to take a strong position, or two. I want those times to be about matters that will make a big difference, so I want to choose them carefully, and not get caught up in the little things.
Second, I never say I don't like something unless I have a replacement in mind AND I have data to back up my suggestion. For example, if a client wants to use a meta description that's more than 165 characters, I give them the facts. In this case, the facts are:
- Search engines will cut off a site description somewhere between 165 and 172 characters, which means that your description will end like this ...
- If that happens, the number of people that will click on your site in a search results will drop by 33%. I don't understand the psychological explanation, but that is an effect that has been THOROUGHLY tested by any number of SEO's and companies that have dedicated SEO teams, like Amazon, Google, etc.
At this point, I've spoken my piece and there's nothing more for me to add, unless I am asked. Armed with these facts, my clients decides what they want to do. Usually they rethink how they want their meta description to look, and ask for more input about what goes into a good meta description.
Third, what to do if the design is "over-designed" and the client is unwilling to make any changes? They say it takes 2 people to create a masterpiece; the artist and the assassin to keep the artist from messing it up. There is a point where design should stop, but design can be fun and often it's hard to step back and really take a look at the design and what we're trying to accomplish. Over-design is when the design process doesn't stop and the site design design ends up being so "busy" and outside of the normal visitor's expectations that the average visitor doesn't know what to do and just ends up leaving. Remember, you have
3 seconds.
While this sounds like an extreme case, it's actually not. Unfortunately, this happens from time to time and it's a challenging situation. In these situations, I have to be as forthright as possible. Often times we can work through the design and come out with something both of us can be really proud of.
Just in case you need an example, here is a site that does almost everything that I recommend against when it comes to design and SEO (except for the initial
call to action). Seeings sites like this make me want to go all Rocky Balboa on a side of beef.
http://www.juliegarwood.com/Update: This site has been updated ... I wonder if she read this post. This site has now added navigation at the top so visitors can actually find their way around. Visitors may actually enjoy the "hide and seek" feel of this site now, because aren't forced to play.
Just as a little plug, this site has some great content. I first read their book in 2000, and it had a profound impact. It wasn't earth shattering in itself, but the basic concepts really stuck with me. Look for websites you like and decide WHY you like them, then find sites that suck, and decide WHY they suck.
http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/Cheers,
Chris